Non-Red Supply Chain
What Is a Non-Red Supply Chain? A Guide for Allied Suppliers
Key takeaways
- "Non-red supply chain" is not a U.S. legal term. It is industry shorthand for a supply chain with no inputs from China, Russia, Iran or North Korea, the four countries named in U.S. defense drone law.
- U.S. rules work at the level of components and named companies, and several tighten in 2027: magnet and specialty-metal rules reach back to mining (January 1), Section 1260H indirect purchases (June 30), six Chinese battery makers (October 1) and SMIC, YMTC and CXMT chips (December 23).
- Since December 22, 2025, foreign-produced drones and critical drone components cannot receive new FCC equipment authorizations unless exempt; items on DoD's Blue UAS lists are exempt until January 1, 2028.
- Since December 22, 2025, the American Security Drone Act has barred federal agencies, contractors and grant recipients from operating drones made or assembled by covered foreign entities on federally funded work.
- DoD's Blue UAS list moved from the Defense Innovation Unit to the Defense Contract Management Agency on December 3, 2025, and component makers are now checked by third-party Recognized Assessors.
A non-red supply chain is a supply chain with no components, software, services or ownership ties to China or to the other countries the United States treats as adversaries in defense procurement: Russia, Iran and North Korea. No single U.S. law defines the term. A set of procurement rules, most of them in annual defense authorization acts, decides which parts and suppliers U.S. government buyers can accept.
What do U.S. buyers mean by "non-red"?
U.S. buyers rarely say "non-red". They ask whether a product is "NDAA-compliant", whether it is on DoD's Blue UAS list, or whether it is free of "covered" countries and companies. "Non-red" is shorthand that suppliers outside the United States use for passing all of those tests at once. The tests themselves are set by the U.S. rules below, and a U.S. buyer will check each one separately.
Which U.S. rules decide what counts as "red"?
U.S. rules work at two levels: some name countries, others name companies. The four countries named in U.S. defense drone law are China, Russia, Iran and North Korea (FY2023 NDAA Section 817). The main rules a supplier meets today:
| Rule | What it restricts | Who it binds | Key dates |
|---|---|---|---|
| Section 889, FY2019 NDAA | Telecom and video-surveillance equipment from Huawei, ZTE, Hytera, Hikvision and Dahua | All federal agencies; also a contractor's own use of that equipment, anywhere | Aug 13, 2019 (purchases); Aug 13, 2020 (contractor use) |
| Section 848, FY2020 NDAA, as amended by Section 817, FY2023 NDAA | Drones, and their flight controllers, radios, data links, cameras, gimbals, ground control systems and operating software, from the four covered countries | The Department of Defense (DoD) and its contractors | Dec 20, 2019; four countries since Dec 23, 2022; from Oct 1, 2024, no DoD contracts with companies that operate DJI or other covered companies' drones on DoD work |
| American Security Drone Act, FY2024 NDAA Sections 1821–1833 | Buying or operating drones made or assembled by "covered foreign entities", including with federal funds | All federal agencies, contractors and grant recipients | Purchases from Dec 22, 2023; operations and federal funds from Dec 22, 2025 |
| Section 805, FY2024 NDAA | Contracting with companies on DoD's Section 1260H list of "Chinese military companies", then buying products that contain their goods | DoD | Direct: Jun 30, 2026; indirect: Jun 30, 2027 |
| Section 154, FY2024 NDAA | Batteries produced by CATL, BYD, Envision Energy, EVE Energy, Gotion High-tech or Hithium | DoD | Oct 1, 2027 |
| Section 5949, FY2023 NDAA | Electronic parts and products containing SMIC, YMTC or CXMT chips | All federal agencies | Dec 23, 2027 (FAR rule proposed Feb 17, 2026) |
| DFARS 252.225-7052 | Samarium-cobalt and neodymium-iron-boron magnets, tantalum and tungsten from the four covered countries | DoD contracts | Melted or produced: in force; mined, refined or separated: from Jan 1, 2027 |
| FCC Covered List | New FCC equipment authorizations for foreign-produced drones and critical drone components, plus DJI and Autel by name | Anyone selling drone equipment in the U.S. | Dec 22, 2025; exemptions below |
Recent DoD and FCC documents refer to DoD as the "Department of War"; the statutes above still say "Department of Defense".
The 2025–2026 overhaul of the Federal Acquisition Regulation is renumbering some of these clauses through class deviations. In DoD contracts, the drone clause is now DFARS 252.240-7994 (Class Deviation 2026-O0025, Revision 3) and the magnet clause is 252.225-7961 (Class Deviation 2026-O0041). Always check the clause numbers in the solicitation itself.
Why does the FCC's December 2025 drone decision matter for allied suppliers?
The FCC decision matters because it reaches allies too. On December 22, 2025, the FCC added drones and critical drone components "produced in a foreign country" to its Covered List, and covered equipment cannot receive new FCC equipment authorizations. The list of critical components is broad: data and communications equipment, flight controllers, ground stations, navigation, sensors and cameras, batteries, motors and associated software.
Exemptions exist. Under the FCC's October 2, 2026 notice, drones and critical components on DoD's Blue UAS lists are exempt until January 1, 2028. The FCC's term covers both the Cleared List of complete drones and the Framework list of components and software. Drones and components that qualify as domestic end products under the Buy American standard are exempt on the same terms, and products under a DoD or Department of Homeland Security Conditional Approval are exempt while the company follows its onshoring plan.
For an allied component maker, this means access to the U.S. commercial drone market now runs through the same gate as U.S. defense sales: Blue UAS. If you assemble drones or components in the United States from foreign-made parts, confirm with counsel how the FCC's "produced in a foreign country" language applies before relying on U.S. assembly alone.
What is Blue UAS, and how does a component maker get listed?
Blue UAS is DoD's list of vetted drones and drone components. It has two main parts: the Cleared List of complete drones that DoD has validated as compliant and cyber-secure, and the Framework of NDAA-compliant components and software. The Defense Innovation Unit created it in 2020 and transferred it to the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) on December 3, 2025.
A component maker does not apply to DoD directly. The steps, as published in 2025:
- Submit the component through the Blue UAS portal.
- Contract with one of the Recognized Assessors, which quotes the cost and timeline.
- The assessor checks component-level NDAA compliance, ownership, supply-chain and country-of-origin documents, and software and firmware.
- The assessor reports to the government, which decides on listing.
DCMA now runs the portal, so confirm its current requirements before you submit. As of November 19, 2025, the list included more than 39 certified systems and 165 components.
What should an allied supplier be ready to prove?
An allied supplier should be ready to prove the origin of every part, not just its own nationality. A company from an allied country is not "red", but a Chinese-made radio, battery cell or magnet inside its product can make the product ineligible in the United States. Before a U.S. buyer or a Blue UAS assessor asks, have:
- A bill of materials with country of origin for every restricted category: flight controllers, radios and data links, cameras and gimbals, ground control systems, batteries, motors and magnets.
- Software provenance: where the operating software and firmware were developed, and where data is stored or processed.
- Ownership and control records showing no ownership or control from a covered country.
- Sub-tier checks against the named companies: the Section 1260H list, the six battery makers, and SMIC, YMTC and CXMT chips.
- Section 889 hygiene in your own operations if you will contract with U.S. federal agencies, since Part B covers a contractor's own use of Huawei, ZTE, Hikvision, Dahua or Hytera equipment.
- One evidence file an assessor can review without follow-up questions.
What this means for allied companies
"Non-red" is not a certificate. It is evidence: component-level, documented, and checked against U.S. rules that keep tightening. The 2027 dates matter more than the 2026 ones, because they reach deeper into the supply chain: mined magnet inputs, indirect Section 1260H content, batteries and chips. And until January 1, 2028, when the current FCC exemption ends, Blue UAS listing is the most direct route for allied drone components into both U.S. defense programs and the U.S. commercial market.
Frequently asked questions
Is "non-red supply chain" a legal term in the United States?
No. U.S. rules use terms such as "covered foreign country" (defense drone purchases), "covered country" (the DFARS magnet and specialty-metal clause) and "covered foreign entity" (the American Security Drone Act). "Non-red" is industry shorthand for clearing all of them.
Which countries count as "red" under U.S. rules?
For U.S. defense drone purchases: China, Russia, Iran and North Korea, under FY2020 NDAA Section 848 as amended in 2022. Other rules name companies instead, such as Huawei and ZTE under Section 889 or six Chinese battery makers under FY2024 NDAA Section 154.
Does Blue UAS listing exempt a drone part from the FCC Covered List?
For now, yes. The FCC's October 2, 2026 notice exempts drones and critical components on DoD's Blue UAS lists (both the Cleared List of complete drones and the Framework list of components and software), and those that qualify as domestic end products under the Buy American standard, until January 1, 2028.
When do the next U.S. restrictions take effect?
January 1, 2027 (magnet and specialty-metal inputs traced to the mine), June 30, 2027 (products containing goods from Section 1260H companies), October 1, 2027 (the six named battery makers) and December 23, 2027 (SMIC, YMTC and CXMT semiconductors).
Sources
- FY2020 NDAA (Public Law 116-92), Section 848: UAS from covered foreign countries, accessed October 24, 2026
- FY2023 NDAA (Public Law 117-263), Section 817: covered foreign countries and covered UAS companies, accessed October 24, 2026
- FY2024 NDAA (Public Law 118-31): Sections 154 (batteries), 805 (Section 1260H) and 1821–1833 (American Security Drone Act), accessed October 24, 2026
- FAR 52.204-25: Prohibition on contracting for certain telecommunications and video surveillance services or equipment, accessed October 24, 2026
- FAR 52.240-1: Prohibition on unmanned aircraft systems manufactured or assembled by American Security Drone Act-covered foreign entities, accessed October 24, 2026
- DFARS 252.225-7052: Restriction on the acquisition of certain magnets, tantalum, and tungsten, accessed October 24, 2026
- DoD Class Deviation 2024-O0014: Prohibition on operation or procurement of foreign-made unmanned aircraft systems, accessed October 24, 2026
- DoD Class Deviation 2026-O0025, Revision 3: DFARS Part 240 under the FAR overhaul (drone clause 252.240-7994), accessed October 24, 2026
- DoD Class Deviation 2026-O0041, Revision 1: DFARS Part 225 under the FAR overhaul (magnet clause 252.225-7961), accessed October 24, 2026
- Federal Register 2026-03065: FAR proposed rule, prohibition on certain semiconductor products and services, accessed October 24, 2026
- FCC DA 25-1086: Covered List updated to include foreign-produced UAS and UAS critical components, accessed October 24, 2026
- FCC DA 26-1063: Covered List exemptions extended to January 1, 2028, accessed October 24, 2026
- Defense Innovation Unit: Blue UAS list transitions to DCMA, accessed October 24, 2026
- Defense Innovation Unit: Recognized Assessors for Blue UAS NDAA compliance, accessed October 24, 2026
Preparing to show U.S. buyers that your supply chain is non-red? Our Companies practice helps allied manufacturers turn supply-chain evidence into U.S.-ready positioning. Request a Fit Assessment.
This article is for general information and is not legal, investment or export-control advice.